Fast ForWord vs. Lumosity or Brain HQ
Which brain training software is right for your child?
Brain training software takes advantage of neuroplasticity to improve brain function, but their game designs and goals differ.
Brain HQ and Lumosity are brain stimulation games aiming primarily at helping adults roll back the cognitive clock or build skills that never quite clicked in. The protocols suggest 2-3 sessions a week for a few minutes to keep adult brains fresh. Neither program tracks outcomes.
Participants do progress steadily through the game levels but there is no proven transfer. There is no proof that better game-skills translate or “transfer” into gains in reading, comprehension, attention or other life skills.
Fast ForWord is a heavy-duty remedial reading program, aiming to step-change learning and reading ability. The protocol is 3-5 days a week for at least 30 minutes a day with professional oversight and guidance. It treats auditory processing deficits and other cognitive skill gaps to improve reading and learning proficiency.
Pre- and post-testing correlates with the national reading standard measure, Woodcock-Johnson. The program aims to build cognitive skills that transfer into measurable reading and language improvements. Fast ForWord is backed by 300+ research studies that, for the most part, prove this transfer occurs.
What is Brain HQ?

Its programs address cognitive issues related to aging, Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, Parkinson’s, chronic pain, schizophrenia, and chemobrain conditions.
What is Lumosity?

What Is Fast ForWord by Gemm Learning?

Where Brain HQ, Lumosity and Fast ForWord Are Similar
While Fast ForWord is light-years ahead in terms of studies to validate results, there are features in common:
- Cognitive Training To Change Brain Function
All three programs exercise cognitive skills using adaptive exercises that add speed and/or complexity in tiny increments. Brain HQ and Lumosity are primarily focused on memory and processing speed, while Fast ForWord is focused on reading and the auditory processing, language, and attention skills required for reading.
Why brain training? - Neuroscience Based
Neuroscientists developed all three programs. Fast ForWord was developed by 4 world-renowned American neuroscientists and cognitive researchers. Its development included work in about 50 leading universities around the world. Brain HQ was developed by a team lead by Dr. Merzenich, while Lumosity uses university research, mainly from Stanford University.
Where Brain HQ/Lumosity and Fast ForWord by Gemm Learning Differ
Proven vs. Unproven Outcomes
Because Fast ForWord is always provided in a managed environment (either in the room or monitored remotely), it lends itself to peer-reviewed study conditions where the study setup matches the actual student experience. Because Lumosity and Brain HQ provide their service without supervision, it is hard for them to make any real claims — doing a study with monitored students would not reflect the experience of their actual client base.
For Lumosity in particular, the research is sparse. There is not much evidence of gains beyond the skill gains in the exercises themselves. In fact, the FTC fined Lumosity for overstating its research backing.
In contrast, Fast ForWord is first and foremost a reading program — its outcome goals are clear. The 300+ studies of Fast ForWord around the world use nationally accepted reading assessments for pre- and post-testing. Gemm Learning students average 2+ years of gain from Fast ForWord.
Age Profile
Fast ForWord is primarily for K-12 children, while Lumosity and Brain HQ cater to adult needs. This is important:
- Fast ForWord starts at a level children 6 and older can handle. It pulls them to sequentially higher levels in tiny, incremental steps. The adult program exercises are much harder. To avoid boredom and to capture attention from the outset, the exercises start at a higher base level or are just flat-out adult-level exercises.
- Fast ForWord emphasizes phonological awareness and sound discrimination, essential decoding skills many young children have yet to master. After a lifetime of listening to language, most adults have no problems here. So phonological awareness exercises aren’t part of Brain HQ or Lumosity.
- The computer game graphics differ. Fast ForWord has a K-3 program with young graphics, and a space-age theme designed to appeal to older children and teens. While most reviews of Brain HQ and Lumosity describe the games as engaging, their interface and content aim at adults.
Program Content, Goals and Outcomes
While Brain HQ and Lumosity primarily target age-related declines in brain function, Fast ForWord is a reading program. It starts with sound-based cognitive exercises and then quickly moves into decoding and fluency, language structure, spelling, and comprehension — reading skills not addressed in the other two programs.
Monitored vs. Unsupervised
At-home programs are notoriously ineffective, if only because participation at home without supervision can be inconsistent. That is fine if you are doing an online brain training program to help brighten your life a little. It is not fine if you are relying on the program to help your child turn the corner in reading or at school. Gemm Learning provides constant supervision and motivational tools to help you stick with it and get results.
Brain HQ, Lumosity or Fast ForWord?
The choices are clear-cut:
- If you are an adult looking to improve processing, memory or even learning efficiency skills then Brain HQ or Lumosity are great alternatives.
- If you are a parent looking for a reading or learning program for your K-12 child, then Fast ForWord is the only real choice.
- If you are an adult with a reading problem, your choice is more complex. While Brain HQ and possibly Lumosity can improve some cognitive skills, you are on your own. There is no oversight or guidance. Furthermore, these programs do not cover the fluency, vocabulary, and reading comprehension exercises seen in the Fast ForWord series.
The reviews of Lumosity and Brain HQ are reasonably positive. However, the starting goal, mind improvement as opposed to remediation of reading difficulties, is a low bar. Many activities are “good” for the brain. By comparison, the positive Fast ForWord reviews reflect success in delivering on much higher goals, overcoming reading and learning difficulties.

